17 Comments /

Studio Rikka in Noitamina + Artfaggory ruining the timeslot

Stu­dio Rikka, the cre­at­ors of Pale Cocoon and Time of Eve, are on show in the Noit­am­ina timeslot this sea­son. Many people may be sur­prised at this fact. I mean, aren’t House of Five Leaves and Tatami Galaxy the two shows this sea­son in Noit­am­ina? Isn’t Five Leaves done by Man­globe, and Tatami Galxy done by Mad­house? Yup, that’s all true, but Rikka are still present this sea­son. Don’t believe me?

OK, it’s not a second sea­son of Time of Eve or any­thing, but it’s some­thing! The style of that mini Noit­am­ina open­ing is very sim­ilar to that of the Time of Eve cred­its. I sup­pose it’s a relief that they’re stay­ing in employ­ment some­how. Plus their involve­ment with Crunchyroll was one of the most suc­cess­ful things CR did and gained them huge expos­ure. You never know, Stu­dio Rikka in the Noit­am­ina timeslot for real?

OK, slightly jokey side of this post aside, there’s some­thing that’s been bug­ging me about Noit­am­ina shows recently. This sea­son saw an all-time low in tele­vi­sion rat­ings for both Noit­am­ina shows with the pro­du­cer going so far as to say he would shave his head if he couldn’t improve things. The first epis­ode of House of Five Leaves got a rat­ing of some­thing like 1.7% where as pre­vi­ous Noit­am­ina offer­ings got in the region of 4 or 5%, with Nodame Can­tabile: Paris fam­ously reach­ing levels of 7.4%, a phe­nom­enal show­ing for a late-night anime and an all-time record high. What’s inter­est­ing in the reports about the pro­du­cer say­ing he would shave is head is that he came under cri­ti­cism for what anime pro­du­cers per­ceived as him tak­ing Noit­am­ina in the wrong dir­ec­tion. It’s pretty obvi­ous what the prob­lem is. Artfaggory.

First let me make this clear: I like both the anime air­ing in Noit­am­ina this sea­son, espe­cially Tatami Galaxy which, des­pite being ini­tially scep­tial of, fast became my second favour­ite show of the sea­son, just behind Arakawa. My point here is not of the per­ceived qual­ity of these artsy shows. It’s that it’s not what the Noit­am­ina audi­ence wants to watch. The dam­age began with Trapeze, which scored some­where in the region of 2.8%, dread­fully low at the time for a Noit­am­ina show. Again, I like Trapeze a lot, but it was cer­tainly far removed from the two pre­vi­ous anime in that timeslot, Eden of the East and Tokyo Mag­nitude. The dam­age wasn’t imme­di­ately appar­ent because Nodame Final aired next sea­son which already had an estab­lished audi­ence, but the full front of the dam­age is clear this season.

The aim of Noit­am­ina is not about pro­du­cing some­thing ‘dif­fer­ent’. It’s about show­ing anime for a demo­graphic out­side the typ­ical  male young adult audi­ence. It’s not aimed at con­nois­seurs of anime, it’s aimed at people who don’t typ­ic­ally watch anime. Think about the shows that were suc­cess­ful. There’s not a whole lot par­tic­u­larly dif­fer­ent from the norm about Eden of the East, Tokyo Mag­nitude, Nodame, Moy­ashi­mon and so on. They’re a mix­ture of high concept stor­ies and pop­u­lar josei manga adapt­a­tions. It was never about gain­ing crit­ical approval from wherever. It’s simply about put­ting out titles that reach a wider, slightly dif­fer­ent audi­ence than nor­mal. Maybe the crit­ical approval of the titles got to the pro­du­cers head when he green-lit two artsy shows in the sea­son Noit­am­ina was meant to make a break­through being an hour long? Iron­ic­ally, one thing that’s draw­ing audi­ences away from the Noit­am­ina offer­ings is that Dur­arara is air­ing at the same time, a show that feels far more aimed at the typ­ical Noit­am­ina audi­ence than either of those air­ing there this season.

This is just a vague the­ory I’m throw­ing out there and I’d be really inter­ested to hear oth­ers opin­ion on the mat­ter. Both the shows air­ing next sea­son in Noit­am­ina are break­ing this trend of artsy shows so maybe the audi­ence will come flood­ing back. The qual­ity of the anime in that timeslot has never been of ques­tion. I just hope it doesn’t go the way Anime no Chi­kara appears to be going due to poor exec­ut­ive decisions.

This entry was posted in Editorials and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

17 Comments

  1. Posted June 20, 2010 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    It’s def­in­itely an inter­est­ing the­ory, and per­haps it shows that TV is the wrong area to try avant-garde mater­ial. I’ll admit I never really paid atten­tion to time slots and the like since it is easy not know­ing, but it is inter­est­ing think­ing about it.

    • Scamp
      Posted June 21, 2010 at 7:46 pm | Permalink

      I won­der how avant-garde makes money anyway?

      I don’t nessesar­ily think artsy has no place on tv but per­haps on a timeslot of its own and not bar­ging in on Noitamina’s typ­ical audience.

  2. luffyluffy
    Posted June 21, 2010 at 12:00 am | Permalink

    To me, It never really felt like House of Five Leaves was Art­f­ag­gotry. Mostly because the ori­ginal manga for House of Five Leaves was already done in that style. Though, Tatami Galaxy cant be for­given, no mat­ter how fun it is to watch.

    • Scamp
      Posted June 21, 2010 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

      House of Five Leaves cer­tainly isn’t as art­f­ag­gory as Tatami Galaxy but it looks just dif­fer­ent enough from the norm that it could turn off cas­ual viewers

  3. Posted June 21, 2010 at 12:27 am | Permalink

    Mononoke is one of the most artsy of noit­am­inA anime and also one of its most pop­u­lar, so, I don’t think you can say artsy equals no pop­ular­ity, it’s just a case of schedul­ing. I mean, along side Dur­arara!! on Thursday nights, there’s also Ook­iku Furika­butte; their audi­ence has been totally diluted by these two titles with estab­lished and devoted fan­bases; may be they could see this hap­pen­ing in advance and decided to go with two dif­fer­ent shows just to offer an altern­at­ive to the above?

    Whatever the case, I really hope this doesn’t hurt noit­am­inA in the future. Their whole thing is to attract a dif­fer­ent type of fan to anime and it would suck if they threw in the towel and went com­pletely gen­eric. They should be applauded for their fail­ures. Oh, and told you so about Tatami (*rasp­berry*) :)

    • Posted June 21, 2010 at 9:09 am | Permalink

      I com­pletely agree about audi­ence dilu­tion. Dur­arara and Ook­iku Furika­butte are both very pop­u­lar. Also the female audi­ence that has been import­ant to Noit­am­ina suc­cess in the past are watch­ers of Dur­arara. Accord­ing to this ( http://bit.ly/99OSWa ), Dur­arara watch­ers are over 60% female (as opposed to less than 30% of Angel Beats watchers).

    • Scamp
      Posted June 21, 2010 at 8:00 pm | Permalink

      Didn’t know it was also com­pet­ing against Ook­iku Furika­butte and @Joojoobees is right about the female audi­ence that Noit­am­ina is aimed towards. I did hear that the time they aired at was moved so it clashed with these anime and I do know that a lot of it is down to really poor exec­ut­ive decisions. I dare say part of the reason they agreed the deal with Fun­im­a­tion this sea­son is because it’s an audi­ence that won’t have time clashes.

      How­ever I don’t think it’s a coin­cid­ence either that it also dipped dur­ing Trapeze’s air­ing and we’ve seen a sim­ilar col­lapse dur­ing these shows airing.

      How­ever I doubt there’s any chance Noit­am­ina would go gen­eric. That’s cer­tainly noth­ing you could accuse pre­vi­ous offer­ings. They’re not as crazilly dif­fer­ent as Tatami is but the timeslot will die before it turns to generic.

      And yes, you were right about Tatami. But he still talks too fast :P

  4. Posted June 21, 2010 at 12:34 am | Permalink

    I was get­ting ready to blast you for an anti-creativity sen­ti­ment, but then you had to go and make some really good points. Damn you.

    Speak­ing of Anime no Chi­kara (which was a noble idea which has unfor­tu­nately been executed so tep­idly), let’s not for­get the now defunct Noise, which couldn’t sur­vive des­pite air­ing highly acclaimed titles like Michiko to Hatchin, Ris­tor­ante Para­diso and Aoi Hana. As much as I hate to say it, because Noise res­ul­ted in such gems dur­ing its short life­time, it’s a good guide for Noit­am­ina as to what not to do. I think two things will work for Noit­am­ina in the long run: 1) it’s been around for a few years now so it’s well estab­lished. 2) it has (to my under­stand­ing) a fair amount of fin­an­cial backing.

    • Scamp
      Posted June 21, 2010 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

      Sen­sa­tion­al­ist post titles is what I do second best (the best is bash­ing your favour­ite shows)

      I read a the­ory by psgels that the reason Noise didn’t suceed is because it didn’t have an tagline or an aim the same way Noit­am­ina and Anime no Chi­kara does. The thing about pre­vi­ous Noit­am­ina titles is they clearly had an audi­ence and it was never about simply try­ing to put out qual­ity titles. In that way it works really well and that’s what they seemed to have lost this season.

      (I per­son­ally didn’t like any of the Noise shows but eh~)

  5. Posted June 21, 2010 at 12:34 am | Permalink

    That’s a nice catch there with Stu­dio Rikka.

    I’ve read some­where (though that data still has to be veri­fied) that while Tatami Galaxy isn’t in Nodame’s level, it’s still doing pretty well con­sid­er­ing that it is an artsy anime. The worst series per­form­ance in that slot was Trapeze at 2.8%. I don’t know, I think it’s good enough hav­ing main­tained 3–4% rat­ings for a series like that.

    Tatami Galaxy may be an anime for non-casual fans, but it is also the most approach­able of Mas­aaki Yuasa’s offer­ings. There’s of course the art­house, avant-garde feel in it (that can never be removed from a Yuasa cre­ation), but the set­ting and the story is quite mundane, quite seated in the real world: a cow­ardly per­son escapes to the realm of his choices because he can­not face real­ity, and in the pro­cess ali­en­ates the only per­son who has con­sist­ently cared for him. That’s not like the out­land­ish storylines of Kaiba or Kemono­zume: it’s very much a series rooted in human­ity and the real world.

    I’m just really thank­ful Noit­am­inA dared to air this kind of show because I’m doubt­ful that a series like this will come out if they haven’t sup­por­ted it. There are very few series nowadays that make one proud he watches anime, and Tatami Galaxy is one of them: its utter depth, invent­ive­ness, and pathos rivals even the best movies I’ve seen. I’m just hop­ing that it main­tains its con­sist­ency until its ending.

    Anime no Chi­kara is dif­fer­ent because most of the series that came out from that timeslot are pretty bad series. No mat­ter how good the art looks like, if you have deriv­at­ive stor­ies for the most part, you won’t get a lot of people inter­ested in you.

    Sora no Woto was a bad series. From what I’ve read, so have been the other offer­ings of this timeslot. Any­way, those are just my two cents.

    • Scamp
      Posted June 21, 2010 at 8:15 pm | Permalink

      Nu-uh, the rat­ings on one of those links says 1.7% rat­ings for Tatami epis­ode 2, which is bloody miser­able for a Noit­am­ina show.

      The writ­ing for Tatami Galaxy is abso­lutely fant­astic but I do have my prob­lems with it, nearly all of which stem from Yuasa’s dir­ec­tion of the series. I never thought I’d say this, but here’s a series that is chock full of more unes­sas­ary anim­a­tion quirks than any­thing Shinbo has ever done. There’s stretches of the story that gets ruined by his non­sense, epis­odes 1 and 9 being two in par­tic­u­lar that grated on my nerves.

  6. Posted June 21, 2010 at 2:43 am | Permalink

    The prob­lem with this sea­son is that they went for TWO “artsy” series at once. Had they gone for some­thing more in line with what’s come in the past and used it as a lead-in for a more exper­i­mental show the rat­ings prob­ably would have been bet­ter. Hook the audi­ence with some­thing more to their lik­ing and then expect a good chunk of them to stick around for the second show. Not sure what else is sup­posed to air along­side the live action Moy­ashi­mon next sea­son, but I’d call Moy­ashi­mon a good example of a show to act as a lead-in.

    • Scamp
      Posted June 21, 2010 at 8:23 pm | Permalink

      The other anime in Noit­am­ina next sea­son is Shiki, which has a pretty stand­erd style so I’ll be really inter­ested in see­ing if the rat­ings returns to normal.

      House of Five Leaves manga is writ­ten by a pop­u­lar josei mangaka so the­or­et­ic­ally it should be per­fect for Noit­am­ina. I sup­pose the Fuji TV exec­ut­ives should have learned from the fail­ure of Ris­tor­ante Para­diso that her pop­ular­ity in manga wouldn’t trans­late to anime but eh~

  7. ~xxx
    Posted June 21, 2010 at 11:27 am | Permalink

    if we put it on a very shal­low state… ‘artsy’ would be asso­ci­ated with any­thing that was cre­ated uniquely with A-R-T.

    but, it would trig­ger com­ments that will put it to 150% star­dom or 150% failure.

    any­ways, I’ll have just to wait before the longest day ends.

  8. luffyluffy
    Posted June 21, 2010 at 11:58 pm | Permalink

    HAHA, I JUST REALISED THE TITLE SAYS ARTFAGGORY INSTEAD OF ARTFAGGOTRY, HAHAHAHAHAHA

  9. Posted June 22, 2010 at 3:45 am | Permalink

    I’ve hon­estly not been able to really get into either of the Noit­am­inA series this sea­son. I can sort of blame school­work, but now that I’m out of school, I spend more time prac­ti­cing gui­tar than I do pretty much any­thing else. Still, I some­how watch a hand­ful of sub-par shows over House of Five Leaves and Tatami Galaxy.

    It’s not that I don’t think that they’re good, it’s just that they don’t appeal to me as much as pre­vi­ous shows have. Eden of the East and Tokyo Mag­nitude were imme­di­ate “watch” shows for me. Of course, I also have a track record of not really fol­low­ing their Josei adapt­a­tion shows either.……Hmm, I see where this is going.

    It’s also test­a­ment to lower qual­ity shows *and* my gen­eral lack of interest from me when I only watched 7 shows this sea­son as opposed to my usual 12–15. The­or­et­ic­ally, I have enough room to watch more shows, but I choose not to.

  10. Posted June 30, 2010 at 8:24 am | Permalink

    You make an inter­est­ing point. The shows this sea­son (out­side of Nodame) are cer­tainly “dif­fer­ent” than the block­buster nature of Eden of the East and Tokyo Mag­nitude. They are odd, eso­teric, and I would say out­side the main­stream, which con­trast with some of Noitamina’s biggest hits.

    I always give the slot my atten­tion because of its past suc­cess, but I admit this year the shows have been inter­est­ing, but never a must watch along the lines of Eden or Mag­nitude. While I like the occa­sional change of pace (some­thing like Tatami Galaxy…even Trapeze is still on my back­log) is ok, but I would be dis­ap­poin­ted if Noit­am­ina went the “artsy” route.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting

  • Categories

  • Anime

  • Affiliates

  • Aniblog Aggregators

  • Top Commenters

  • Archives

  • Other blog stuff