One Comment /

Is anime simply just ‘a cartoon made in Japan’

Lets do some ima­gin­at­ive work here. Ima­gine that the cre­at­ors of D-Gray Man want to make a sequel. Let’s call this new anime ‘D-Gray Man Ship­puden’. So the pro­duc­tion team get together, hire all their old voice act­ors and get everything ready until BOOM! Their stu­dio gets hit by an earth­quake and all their equip­ment gets des­troyed (this is not entirely unbe­liev­able. There’s meant to be a giant earth­quake about to hit Tokyo soon, at least accord­ing to Bones). So D-Gray Man Ship­puden can’t be made.

But wait! Step in a Rus­sian bil­lion­aire. Rus­sia is a great place for bil­lion­aires. This guy is an otaku who is quite a fan of the D-Gray man manga. He heard of the ter­rible news and decided he really wanted to see the later chapters anim­ated. So what does he do? Why, the only logical option is to build his own stu­dio in Rus­sia and hire the com­pany to come over and anim­ate the new sea­son. Of course he owns the rights and gets a per­cent­age of the profits but the anime is still in Japan­ese and gets aired of Japan­ese tele­vi­sion in it’s old time slot. But this doesn’t get lis­ted as an anime as it wasn’t made in Japan.

Some­thing seems wrong here doesn’t it. Lets take a few more examples: The latest CLAMP manga gets anim­ated by a french com­pany because they offered them more money. CLAMP is pretty much defin­it­ive anime and yet this also wouldn’t count. Or how about South Parks stu­dio moves over to Japan for a new sea­son (or even bet­ter, the cre­at­ors of Avatar move to Japan to cre­ate a new show with the exact same anim­a­tion style). Do these sud­denly count as anime? It’s not anim­a­tion style either, oth­er­wise Kaiba’s claim to be an anime gets changed to just being a funky Dr.Seass style cartoon.

So where does the wall end?

This entry was posted in Editorials, Ye Olde Days and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

7 Comments

  1. Posted June 28, 2009 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think defin­ing some­thing as anime simply means its anim­a­tion was pro­duced in Japan; I think the main defin­i­tion is that it was made for a Japan­ese audi­ence (per­haps the ori­ginal con­cepts behind the stor­ies came from Japan­ese people too). A lot of anime stu­dios have some parts of their anim­a­tion pro­duced in Korea or other Asian coun­tries, so I don’t think it mat­ters where the anim­a­tion was made to call some­thing anime; what mat­ters is that the tar­get audi­ence is Japan­ese and the ideals and cul­ture behind the anime’s story is Japanese.

  2. Thndrwtch!
    Posted June 28, 2009 at 11:40 pm | Permalink

    Well, in my humble opin­ion, as long as the ele­ments (aes­thetic and non-aesthetic), cul­ture and the con­cepts are pre­served, they will still be known as ANIMEs. It doesn’t really mat­ter where are they produced.

  3. Posted June 28, 2009 at 11:41 pm | Permalink

    Cor­rect me if I’m wrong but isn’t Hell­sing FAR more pop­u­lar abroad than it is in Japan? I think Bac­cano also didn’t do very well. I’m pretty sure there are other bet­ter examples of anime made to appeal to a west­ern audi­ence. And anime’s pop­ular­ity abroad shows how it is most def­in­itely not con­fined to appeal to just the Japanese.

  4. Posted June 29, 2009 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    Uh, what? I don’t agree with this at all. Anime is just Japan­ese for anim­a­tion. That’s all it is. It’s just Japan’s stu­pid way of short­en­ing things to sound cool. If it’s made or brough into Japan and it’s anim­a­tion then called anime. South Park is anime. Avatar is anime.

    Now if you’re talk­ing about the style dis­tinct to Japan­ese anim­a­tion that is a dif­fer­ent story.

  5. Posted June 30, 2009 at 1:15 am | Permalink

    Anime is whatever is lis­ted on ANN, MAL and other such sites. What I’m sug­gest­ing is when do these sites start to list other stuff and when do they draw the line.

  6. kadian1364
    Posted June 30, 2009 at 1:29 am | Permalink

    Koji Oe is right in that the Japan­ese call all anim­a­tion ‘anime’, so things like Pixar films, South Park, etc. would be called that in Japan. But I think there’s a spe­cific defin­i­tion we mean when we say ‘anime’ out­side of the Land of the Rising Sun. Firstly, you can’t look at aes­thet­ics, or cus­toms, or typ­ical kinds of stor­ies to define anime, because someone will always be able to point to half a dozen excep­tions. It’s all about the ori­ginal language.

    Being pro­duced in Japan­ese lan­guage, with Japan­ese act­ors, cred­its, writers, and pro­du­cers all point to the same thing: it was made for the Japan­ese audi­ence first and fore­most. It’s hardly import­ant if Hell­sing or Cow­boy Bebop are more pop­u­lar in the west, or if it was anim­ated in some stu­dio in Korea or Rus­sia, it was Japan­ese first, and that’s how I clas­sify anime.

  7. Posted June 30, 2009 at 1:54 am | Permalink

    So accord­ing to you Afro Samurai isn’t an anime?

    Not an accus­a­tion but a ques­tion. I’ve yet to see a place that doesn’t list Afro Samurai as an anime

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Twitter

  • Categories

  • Anime

  • Archives

  • Other blog stuff